Penetration Testing
Authorized security testing methodology - reconnaissance, vulnerability scanning, exploitation, and reporting to find weaknesses before attackers do.
skill: Penetration Testing category: Security tags: [Penetration Testing, Security, Ethical Hacking, Burp Suite, Reconnaissance] readingTime: 7
Penetration testing is authorized, structured security assessment - fundamentally different from unauthorized hacking. Always have a signed scope document before testing. If you're preparing for a career in security, pursue OSCP or CEH certifications and practice on platforms like HackTheBox, TryHackMe, or your own lab environment.
Workflow
- Define scope and rules of engagementTesting without authorization is illegal. A signed scope document defines what systems can be tested, from which IPs, during what hours, and what attack types are permitted.
- Passive and active reconnaissanceReconnaissance maps the attack surface before attempting exploitation - understanding what's exposed is more valuable than immediately scanning for vulnerabilities.
- Web application testing with Burp SuiteBurp Suite is the standard proxy for web app testing - it intercepts, modifies, and replays HTTP requests to find injection, auth bypass, and business logic flaws.
- Exploit and demonstrate impactFinding a vulnerability is not enough - demonstrating actual impact (data exfiltration, privilege escalation) convinces stakeholders to fix it.
- Write a professional reportA pentest without a clear report has zero business value. The report is the deliverable - it must be readable by both technical staff and executives.
Output Format
Pentest deliverable: scope agreement, technical findings with severity/CVSS/PoC, and executive summary with remediation guidance.
Pentest Report:
├── Executive Summary
│ ├── Risk rating: Critical/High/Medium/Low
│ └── Top 3 recommended actions
├── Findings
│ ├── CRIT-01: SQL Injection in /api/login
│ ├── HIGH-01: Missing MFA on admin panel
│ └── MED-01: Verbose error messages
└── Methodology & ScopeExamples
Edge Cases & Gotchas
- Scope creep temptation - Finding a link to an out-of-scope system during testing is tempting to follow. Don't - note it in the report as 'potential attack vector discovered' and stop at the boundary.
- Disrupting production services - Some exploits (buffer overflows, DoS) crash services. Test in staging unless explicitly authorized for production, and test during the agreed maintenance window.
- Storing captured credentials - Captured passwords must be stored securely (encrypted), used only to demonstrate access, and deleted at report delivery. Include data handling procedures in the scope document.
- False positives from scanners - Automated scanners report 30-50% false positives. Always manually verify every finding before including it in the report.
When to Break These Rules
- Hire a professional external pentest firm for compliance requirements (PCI DSS, SOC 2, ISO 27001) - internal teams doing their own pentest has inherent bias and may not satisfy auditors.
- Use bug bounty programs (HackerOne, Bugcrowd) as a continuous supplement to point-in-time pentests - real attackers test year-round, not once a year.
Reference Files
https://owasp.org/www-project-testing-guide/https://www.offensive-security.com/metasploit-unleashed/